Do I like his music because I like his politics or do I like his politics because I like his music? I have thought about this sometimes. The answer to the second question is easy - NO. I was not sure of the answer to the first question right away though. I started wondering.
Then, I remembered the first time I attended his concert. As far as I can remember, it made no particular impression on me. I only remember that I was surprised when I saw him after the concert because he was in Jeans and T-shirt. Now I am surprised that I was surprised.
Flash forward to Krishna’s concert at the Bangalore Fort organised by INTACH on the World Heritage Day 2015, with H K Venkataram on the violin and Arun Prakash on the mridanga. I attended this concert with two of my cousins. At first I was disconcerted that he was wearing an almost fluorescent green shirt with two pockets with flaps not buttoned, the cuffs also not buttoned. When he started singing all that disappeared and I loved the concert. And I caught an earworm too - Muttaiah Bhagavatar’s Khamach daru varna - which bothered me for nearly week. At that time I did not know anything about him, let alone his politics.
So, I do like his music and politics independent of each other.
Over time, I have listened to many other concerts of his live and online. I loved each one of them. I was thrilled that he was to get the title Sangita Kalanidhi. The backlash to this announcement truly astonished me. While I make no comment about that backlash, I was relieved and elated to see the response he got at the Madras Music Academy’s sessions, and his concert, and the Sadas where the title was conferred upon him.
Let me come to what I wanted to say when I started this post – why I like TMK’s music or what I like about his music making.
My mother sang a lot through the day, while she went about her day. Her taste in music was eclectic. She would sing a Mira bhajan, followed by a film song by Jyotika Roy or Saigal, followed by a Karnatak keertane, seamlessly moving to a hindusthani lakshana geethe, etc., to give an idea. Since she was not formally trained in music, she never cared for taala. So singing shlokas and poems from kumaaravyaasa bhaarata was also a part of her repertoire and she had learned the latter from a teacher for a while. But that art form is without taala too. Often, she would sing an alapane in a raga followed by a keertane in that raga followed by another song from any of the other genres but in the same raga.
With this in my mind, I had often wondered and yearned for a music concert by a trained and “good” musician that was like this, let me call it free spirited. Of course, the difference being compositions set to taalas would be sung with due respect to them. Hence, TMK’s concerts, which had this kind of free ranging, meandering, “structure-less structure” feel to them, breaking the “Kacheri” mould, was extremely comforting and satisfying to me. TMK was the answer to my “prayer” I once said to a friend, in jest.
Many shamefaced friends have told me over the years “I listen to Karnatak music but I don’t understand it”. I say shamefaced because they all thought that I understand music and they do not, because they had seen me play the veene or knew that I did and some had often caught me whistling Karnatak songs or tunes. My argument always was, “What do you mean by understanding? You may enjoy a sunset or a sunrise. But do you understand it?” I would also argue that I enjoyed hindusthani music, most often not knowing what raga was being sung or played while I could recognise many Karnatak ragas instantly. Did that add to my enjoyment? I don’t know! Whether my arguments were weak or their belief that one has to understand to really enjoy music was too strong, I do not know. It did not seem to make an impact.
So, when I watched some videos of TMK where he emphatically urged the audience not to worry about what raga he was singing or what taala it was set to or who the composer was, I appreciated it immensely. “Please do not google it and miss parts of what we are presenting”, he urged in one video. An artiste taking the trouble to explain this is extremely satisfying and I appreciate it immensely. I feel that many people are missing out something enriching just because of this myth called understanding and I hope his efforts bear fruit in getting more people to listen, preferably live concerts and not just recordings. I also think that it is a great service to music and to the people!
In one lecdem, (At Ganabharathi, Mysore) he expounded about the role of bhakthi and saahithya in Karnatak music, brilliantly. Please watch from 2:05:00 mark! These were vaguely what I thought too but he demonstrated it effectively. My admiration, already high, grew further.
I know at least a few people who do not like his music because they do not like his politics. Art is deeply personal. I don’t like some musicians that other rasikas, dare I say knowledgeable ones, hold in high regard. I may be missing out on some great music and so be it. And there are others I hold in great regard, MDR springs to mind right away, that some do not like at all and so be it too! I only wish that people appreciate his music for what it is in spite of his politics
All I can say to him is, CONGRATULATIONS Sangita Kalanidhi T M Krishna, thanks for all that you have done and are doing, and I wish you all the very best!